In December 2012, I was one of a few expert guests on a
radio talk show discussing “tactical training”.
The show’s host asked for a definition of “tactical training” (the show’s
topic related to firearms training specifically and thus the answer provided was in terms of firearm’s mechanics and application - however the concept applies
more generally to all types of armed and unarmed combat sciences); while the
answer I provided of applying the basics which were mastered in a ‘flat’
environment (without all the dynamics of the environment of application) in the
‘application’ environment may not have understood by the show’s host, it was
agreed upon my fellow guest “tactical firearm’s training” experts. I found myself at a slight loss as to why the show's host, the president of a firearms training company himself, did not understand what, to me, was a simple response - however as I thought more about it, I began to realize that fundamentals practiced outside the "application environment" are conducive for repetition, but not for building problem solving skills. I also realized that most training is repetition oriented, but not problem solving in nature - so even long standing experts may not have a good understanding of problem solving if all they have focused their training core on is repetitions. And ultimately "tactics" are about problem solving tense, uncertain, and rapidly evolving problem sets.
For the past several years, the Midwest Academy has taken
our TAB (Tactically Applied Basics) Module on the road to various training
venues – the training gap that the program addresses is simple, but extremely
relevant to the “application environment” and thus what makes it a “tactical”
program. That said, before we present you with
our challenge to add to your training regimen, let us offer you a succinct look
at the “why’s” involved:
"The Why's"
Most combatives (armed, unarmed, & even
firearm-based) are taught in straight line relationships. Some of the reasons for that are:
- It is easy to manage a group of students when everyone is lined up the same way;
- It also allows for a safe training environment; and
- It maximizes a training space.
These straight line relationships are what we at the
Midwest Academy define as “0% basics” – they are flat – there are no
deviation dynamics such as lateral movement, elevation changes, changes in
distance, etc., between the threat and
the defender. The practice of “0% basics”
is useful for the development and refining of mechanics that are fundamental to
whatever specific combative technique one is studying. For example, in a fistic strike, the
fundamentals likely should include the shift of the weight forward and down
combined with the alignment of the hip, shoulder, elbow, and weapon surface to
the target’s contact point. For a
firearm, fundamental practice may include establishing a natural point of
aim, proper grip, proper sight alignment, and correct trigger press. Both of these examples are the combat science
equivalent of learning to drive in the store parking lot after the store has
closed and everyone has gone home. It is
a needed building block that facilitates fundamental skill development, however
until one takes the vehicle to the “application environment”, the skills needed
for driving on a highway with merging and lane changing remains an elusive theory.
"0% Basics" or 'flat' fundamentals |
The TAB module draws from the teaching perspectives of the MOUT
(Military Operations on Urban Terrain) and SWAT (Special Weapons and Tactics) environments,
both of which initially focus on understanding the geometric angles
created by various doorways, room designs, building architecture, etc, and using that knowledge as a force multiplier in the action-reaction model (OODA Loop); in the case of the TAB Module, it is applied to the “tool kit” of the unarmed combatant (the base layer of the layered offense theory below).
This approach is dovetailed from the layered
offense training theory advocated by CSAT Founder and SOFD/D (“Delta Force”) MSG
Paul Howe (ret) which I first learned as a young soldier and later refined under MSG
Howe’s instruction; the layered offense training theory states that the system
of fighting with a rifle, pistol, edged/impact weapon, or empty hand should be
fairly uniform such that transitions in either direction are seamless,
adjustments from force option to force option are minimal, and training
for each force option is complimentary to the others. Using this as the base development
perspective for the presentation of the TAB Module allowed myself and the other
Midwest Academy instructors to leverage our military and law enforcement special
operations backgrounds not to “bring Special Ops to the training floor”, but
rather to take the “training floor into the application environment”. The rationale for developing the TAB Module is based on our collective experience which confirms that the action-reaction model, which integrates distance, angle, initiative,
etc, works against the defender unless the defender learns how to maximize the
geometry of the urban environment.
"The How's"
Being introduced to the geometry of the application
environment removes some of the “neatness” associated traditional “0% basics”
in the “flat” environment. As combat
athletes, we normally train these basics on a fixed position target (such as a
heavy bag) or with a partner (such as with pad drills); in either case, we know
we are performing the basic, so we tend to pre-align in a manner that puts us “center
on” the target. Once you have a solid
understanding of your basics at this level (we suggest at least conscious competence), we encourage you to take the
following challenge:
Instead of beginning “center on” your target, place the
target where you would have moved to evade the basic you are working on (see above diagram). In general, the targets would be outside the
left and right planes of your shoulders.
From here you will find that many of you will get tuned into the skill
set of smoothly shifting weight since you are required to initiate lateral
movement to put yourself “center on” the target prior to executing your basic. There are two basic methods of shifting and stepping
that you will learn by doing these “5% adjustments”:
- Method 1 – the target is on the outside of the direction of rotation of the lead leg (for example, defender is left foot lead and the target is to the outside of the defenders left shoulder) – the defender will need to un-weight the lead leg, move it laterally to the outside (and forward if distance requires) with the rear leg moving laterally to the inside; or
- Method 2 – the target is on the inside of the direction of rotation of the lead leg (for example, defender is left foot forward and the target is to the outside of the defenders right shoulder) – the defender will need to un-weight the rear leg, move it laterally to the outside (and forward if distance requires) with the lead leg moving laterally to the inside.
Writing is not always conducive to describing human
motion, however, students at the Midwest Academy and other students that have
been introduced to the TAB Module incorporate these types of “fundamental”
evolutions to their practice with results that increase their agility,
adaptability, and the ultimate utility of their skill sets. If you train simply to "get in shape" with no regard for the application of combatives, the added lateral movement will give you a level of conditioning that few other training drills can provide. Finally, the understanding you gain by doing these drills will also decrease training/application injuries and increase the sustainability of your training by reducing "over extension" and working "outside your work-space" inefficiencies.
We invite you to add these drills to your practice and let us know what you think. If you have any questions on how to
incorporate this into your own training or wish to learn more about ours, please contact us
at (630) 836-3600 or through our website.
No comments:
Post a Comment